Below Her Mouth (2017)

This is probably one of the most unrealistic romantic films I have ever seen and hat says a lot.We are supposed to believe that a person who has been seeing their partner for years falls madly in love with someone over a weekend.I know romantic films do not have to have realism in it but they have to at least have some sort of feeling to suspend disbelief and this movie does not.This is a raunchier version of Room in Rome but without the great performances, dialogue and photography that define that movie.

I decided to give this one a try, as the subject matter is not one I see often, and I wasn't disappointed. This was a lot more explicit than I expected which was a pleasant surprise. Natalie Krill certainly had my full attention throughout. She was amazing! It may not be an accurate portrayal of that lifestyle, but I that's not why I watched. I felt sorry for the fiance; he was totally blindsided. But then again, he over reacted once he found out. All in all, a very entertaining movie.

I originally gave this movie 3 stars but after further consideration downgraded to a 1. This film is so bad it deserves a review. The film centers around a total douche bag lesbian (Dallas) who, without any charm, character, or color, manages to seduce a snobby shallow strait girl (Jasmin) who is engaged to a man (Who we never really get a chance to know because he has only a handful of lines in the film).The acting is terrible, the direction sucks, the script is horribly written, the editing was done by a monkey, and the settings are poorly made.None of the characters are developed in any way so you don't really understand why the two leads fall for each other. The film has almost no men in it as well and when there are men, they are portrayed as assholes of course (the director 'April Mullen' is clearly upset about something).Don't waste your time on this film

As a straight woman I've wondered what the appeal is in a woman who acts like a man? The answer would seem to be that hopefully the more positive qualities that women often have, e.g., sensitivity, awareness of another's feelings, willingness to talk and discuss, would still be there despite the more masculine appearance and personality. In this film, I questioned what was it that attracted Jasmine to Dallas and the answer kept being that Dallas treated her like a princess. Jasmine appeared to "love" Dallas because of Dallas's seeming worship of her. That, and perhaps the greater knowledge of how to treat a woman sexually that lesbians tend to have. So ultimately this was a film about two self-centered characters getting off on each other's ability to feed their respective egos. Another question was again in Dallas's character, she was all about sexually pleasing whatever woman she was with, yet they didn't do the same for her. So naturally, she seemed doomed to wind up feeling unhappy, deprived and somewhat like a martyr. We did see her going down on Jasmine but not the reverse, which also implied the question of whether Jasmine was even into Dallas's body? Ultimately, I have to agree with the other reviewers who said this film was short on plot and big on soft-core eroticism. A couple of questions were raised but there's not enough depth for them to be answered.