UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Drama >

Scenes of a Sexual Nature

Scenes of a Sexual Nature (2006)

November. 03,2006
|
5.9
|
R
| Drama Comedy Romance

Sex and love. Some seek it, some need it, some spurn it and some pay for it, but we're all involved in it. Set on one afternoon on Hampstead Heath in north-west London, the film investigates the minutiae of seven couples. What makes us tick?

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

chriscarney36
2006/11/03

Maybe it's the same reason why I don't find Catherine Tate in the least bit funny that I found this movie (by a Catherine Tate writer) so utterly mundane. Seeing the ratings and reviews on here and indeed hearing people speak so highly of the Tate show, it's clear that I'm missing some vital cog in this machine.I mildly respect the 'equity minimum'/profit share approach and that the director re-mortgaged his house to make it happen but that's where my respect for this picture ends. It is spirit crushingly dull, trite, unimaginative, clichéd and in parts offensive.Every movie should contain a lesson and the lesson this film gave me was that life is way too short, fragile and precious to waste an hour and a half of it watching crap.

More
fauqur
2006/11/04

Preface ~ the word spoilers is tossed around, in the case of this movie you can not spoil the dialog with a description of the events. This is a dialog driven movie and therefore it would be near impossible the watchers experience by describing certain interactions. ~ fauqurIn times such as these where sex is both taboo and the most common marketing tool known to advertising we need more movies of this type. It is a satirical and realistic look at love and sex in our current world state. This film is not one of flashy special effects or deep metaphorical cinematography. The message is in the dialog and is only hidden if you can't read body language or infer for yourself the intended message of the script and actors. This examines all generations and all lifestyles... to a point, but in general it covers the basics. Watch for the re-occurring characters that bring comic relief to each story. I would have to re-watch it but I believe the Actress currently playing Martha Jones on Dr Who is in one of the best scenes in the movie. ~Spoiler~ After enduring a breakup she is approached by a random bloke in the park who tries to comfort her, while not so discreetly attempting to also bang her in the park. The negative reviews no doubt came from people who thought the title meant they were in for adult soft core. This is a social commentary and should be viewed as such.If you are able to put your sex drive in the back seat and take an honest look at sex and love in relation to lifestyle, generation, and social upbringing you will enjoy this fine piece of cinema.I mean if you read the trivia, the actors will all willing to work for minimum and agreed to only receive additional compensation with future sales... I think that proves how much they believed in the film... you can at least give it a shot

More
bob the moo
2006/11/05

A sunny afternoon on Hamstead Heath in London sees couples everywhere. Some of them are breaking up with arguments others are breaking up with affection. Some see ogling others as a betrayal, others see it as part of life. Strangers are thrown together in a temporary moment while others come together for the first time in many years. Love and sex play a part in all of it as the sun warms the day in the background.It was the ensemble nature of the film that drew my attention to it despite the fact that it got mixed reviews. I didn't get round to it in the cinemas but when it came on television recently I managed to check it out. The mixed reviews I mentioned are perhaps understandable because the film itself is the same way in terms of content, quality and success. The "plot" doesn't really flow together because the only tangible connection between the couples is the location however as a device it has potential. The lack of a traditional narrative means that the film really relies heavily on the creation of characters and snapshots to paint a bigger picture of relationships and interactions that will come together thematically in the way that the specific characters do not. Here and there it does sort of do it but too often the scenes are just distracting as stand alone scenes, which is all well and good to some degree but it doesn't work as it needs to.I could forgive many of the specific scenes lacking meaning but, unlike some reviews, I do see the absence of a wider truth to be a bit of an issue and without this the individual scenes have a lot more weight put on them. Sadly few if any of them can really stand up to the pressure and mostly the film just comes across as fragmented and disjointed with the strongest scenes being amusing or mildly engaging while at worst they are so-so but just seem pointless and far too underdeveloped. It is a shame because the cast is impressive and they have the talent to do as much as the material could have asked of them and it is a shame that the material asks little of the majority. McGregor, Okonedo, Tate, Lester, Strong, McKee and Bonneville are the main people you will recognise but the rest of the cast are just as good (or rather, just as OK) although it is Rembauville-Nicolle that sticks in the mind for obvious reasons – which is depressing when you think of the acting talent involved. It isn't their fault and I can understand why so many of them worked on the film for little money but the idea doesn't come through and mostly they are left to try and carry scenes with their performances but little else.Overall then this is a distracting film that offers intermittent pleasures and interest but mostly fails to offer much in the way of honesty and cohesion. Despite the material the cast do try hard to make it more than it is but with little time on screen and seemingly nobody pulling everyone together in the editing suite I'm afraid it is significantly less than the sum of its many parts.

More
reddragon211981
2006/11/06

I read a lot of the reviews and comments that people here typed about this movie, i can't understand how they say it was awful etc... But that is why they say we all have different taste, i just got done watching this movie and i loved it, the movie is very touching, beautiful scenery, funny, entertaining, i read some guy in here made fun of the camera on how it was filmed etc.. ?? I have no clue why he would say that, because the camera the view all of it was perfect, this is why people should watch a movie and judge it by themselves and not always go by what people say, because you might enjoy it as much as me and my family did, the actors and actresses did an outstanding job on this film, so my advice is give it a try you will be impressLoved it!!

More