UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Thriller >

Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks (2007)

June. 01,2007
|
7.3
|
R
| Thriller Crime

A psychological thriller about a man who is sometimes controlled by his murder-and-mayhem-loving alter ego.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

arthurwest-07516
2007/06/01

This is a great thriller supported by a fantastic cast and a great pace. Mr. Brooks is played by Kevin Costner, and he is a serial killer by night, a popular, intelligent self-righteous man of the community by day. He goes by the name Earl when not in killing mode. To make matters even more complicated Mr. Brooks is a persona arisen by a devil voice within Earl- and he is played(not just voiced but physically portrayed) by William Hurt. In one of his outings Brooks is caught in the act of murder by a photographer and then becomes entangled by the law- mainly one lady played by Demi Moore. With actors of such class there is no reason to doubt that the audiences will be kept captivated- and they are. The cinematography, pacing and direction is excellent, and it is surprising that the director Bruce Evans has only made 2 films including this one.

More
oshngrl
2007/06/02

This film was so awful, and put to waste the fine acting talents of at least 3 people (not saying which ones).I'm a huge Costner fan but he has really done some dogs! He could have just about phoned in this performance. All I could think to myself was "this script was the best choice he had in 2006"? And the same went for every other actor in this violent fiasco.A terribly violent film that congratulates itself on it's cleverness all the while boring it's audience to sleep. I actually fell asleep. By this stage we've all scene enough gore to last a lifetime at least I have. I really miss the Costner I fell in love with in "dances with wolves". Why he wanted to be this ugly I'll never know. And by "he" I mean this entire cast.Disappointing.

More
krwrawlings32
2007/06/03

Having missed this in my local cinema a friend, whose movie judgements I usually trust, lent me his DVD copy.Finding a spare couple of hours I put it on and settled back to revel in Kevin Costner shedding his good guy image to 'play the baddie'. Now, the central concept of our Kev playing a mega- successful business man who is secretly addicted to murder I could take. I also had no problem with William Hurt playing his alter-ego - his Mr Hyde to Costner Dr Jekyll if you will. But my credibility began to become stretched when, firstly, "Mr Smith" (Dane Cook) blackmails Mr Brooks into letting him come on a murder spree with him. Then, as if that was unbelievable, we suddenly have ANOTHER killer thrown into the mix in the shape of "The Hangman" (and, of course, his torture loving girlfriend! Of course this guy just happens to be after the cop - female, with marital problems naturally (played by the dreadful Demi Moore!) for reasons... Well, lets just say he has his reasons!OK, so by now I am find any faith in the movie beginning to become sorely tested... Oh look, now we discovered that not only is the Costner character's daughter home from college because she is pregnant, but she has also apparently killed a fellow student... WHAT!!!On top of everything else we also have THE worst continuity ever! At some point - far too convoluted to detail here! - Ms Moore sustains a very bad cut to her head, which we see being stitched up i graphic detail, yet when we next see her - and for the rest of the film - there is not a single sign of the injury, not even a plaster!!Somewhere in amongst all this convoluted, often poorly scripted and poorly acted mess is a decent film trying to escape! I'm not saying it doesn't have its moments - hence the 4 stars - but overall it really is a big, BIG mess!

More
NateWatchesCoolMovies
2007/06/04

There are a few films Kevin Costner has done in which he has really been allowed and been willing to test the boundaries of what is usually expected from him in a role. 3,000 Miles To Graceland and Eastwood's A Perfect World are fine examples. Perhaps the finest though is Mr. Brooks, a dark tale that showcases the actor in a terrifying turn and the last type of role you would picture for him on paper. Opposites are paramount in acting and cinema as a whole, and it's that type of contrarian casting choice that can lead to a performer's finest hours. In this case it's certainly one of Kevin's best outings, and casts him in a frightening new light, or should I say dark. Here he is Earl Brooks, husband, father, businessman and all round stand up guy. Except for the fact that he moonlights as a methodical and psychopathic serial killer. He sees it as an affliction, and is almost ashamed of it, whether by a tiny flicker of a soul he may have, or simply by the standards impressed onto society. He's efficient, cold and hopelessly addicted to the act of murder. His alter ego, or 'dark passenger' as the scholars say, is a cynical persona called Marshall, brought to life by a scary William Hurt. "Why do you fight it, Earl?" he drawls in that committed, laconic snarl that only Hurt can do. There's shades of his character from Cronenberg's A History Of Violence here, affirming my belief that Hurt is a pure acting prodigy and masterful of both the light and the dark within his craft. Earl has a daughter too (Danielle Panabaker) who he has worrisome thoughts about, and a picture perfect wife (Marg Helgenberger). One can't keep the turbulent nightlife of the serial killer a secret for one's entire life though, and pretty soon people start to catch on. A nosy Nelly (Dane Cook) catches a whiff of Earl's crimes and lives to wish he hadn't, and a keen Detective (Demi Moore) begins to piece the puzzle together as well. Earl is as clever as he is murderous though, covering his work and tying off loose ends with gut churning gusto. Costner carries the film terrifically, a man who is at once both uncomfortable in his own skin yet fits it like a glove when the camera dutifully bears witness to his killings. He's like a tiger who really can't change his stripes but wants to shield them from the judgment of others, and of course his own persecution. The scenes of murder are skin crawling in their frank, fly-on-the-wall nature, no slasher cinematics or gimmicky set ups here, just the icy horror of a predator extinguishing human life to sate the beast, and the nightmarish inevitability of death. Those scenes paint Earl in a horrific light, but the film doesn't try to convince us he's a monster using any usual methods, it just presents to us this man, his acts and his life surrounding them, without discernible condoning or condemning. It's cold, it's clinical and it's one of the best serial killer flicks out there.

More