Titanic II (2010)

What a waste of time, maybe it was made entirely on a swimming pool, very poor directing and acting and the story is bad

I"m watching it right now on TV (subtitled into Spanish no less) ... the real titanic movie cost $200 million, this one had a budget of 1/2 a million ... if you watch the movie with the frame of mind that it will be one of the cheesiest and most ridiculous movies you will ever see ... than you might actually get a kick out of watching it and laughing at the ridiculous scenes ... that way it won't be painful to watch. it reeks of low budget at pretty much every scene ... some of the computer graphics are really low quality ... you just can't take this movie seriously!

This was on TV so i decided to check it out... i am a fan of really low budget films, especially the ones which are so bad that their good. This is definitely one of them. It's low on the list, but it's one of them.If you go into this and take it too seriously you probably wouldn't enjoy it. If you want a sequel to James Cameron's Titanic, its not that either. It should be treated as a bit of fun...The special effects are hilariously bad, with terrible CGI and awfully chroma keyed composite shots. The acting is a tad bit iffy, especially from the extras. In one scene the passengers are so panicked that they can't even run to the lifeboats without falling over. It's over the top, which every action movie should be. We have a strong male lead who at the start seems a bit of jerk but actually becomes likable as the move goes along. One of Titanic II's redeeming features was the excellent music, it was dramatic and emotional. It really helped to set the scene, when the actors, story and special effects couldn't.If you liked Poseidon or similar movies, you may like this. Just don't take it too seriously.

Words cannot even begin to describe how awful and boring this film was. Don't bother wasting your time watching it. Lazy casting, lazy filming, lazy editing and terrible actors.Firstly, it is not explored in any detail as to why exactly someone would build a replica of the Titanic. Who would do such a thing? Why would people get on it? Is the boat taking off from New York or California? Where is the boat going? These are just some of the many many unanswered questions that this tragic film poses.Secondly, there are endless factual errors. For example, its worth pointing out that if a boats engine gets cut out, it doesn't just stop. It carries on for a short while, it does not come to an immediate standstill like the Titanic 2 seems to have miraculously done. If any of the directors had paused for a moment they would've realised this, however, they obviously were much more interested in pushing out a lazy half-baked piece of trash aimed at riding on the extremely profitable tail-coat of it's much more successful predecessor (although I hesitate in linking the two in any way shape or form). The acting was also absolutely abysmal. I almost laughed at the cringe-inducing cry of 'NOOO' coming from Amy (played by Marie Westbrook) when her friend Kelly gets crushed by the closing door. Sadly though, it hit me like a wave when I realised that this was supposed to be a serious film, alluding to a very serious disaster. You'll notice though I said 'wave' there, not 'a wave thats carried an ice burg on the crest of itself all the way from the Arctic' because that would be ridiculous, not that that stopped the directors from making that a central feature of the entire film. Overall, an abysmal and tragic film. I could go on for hours pointing out every error, but that would require watching the film again, and I wouldn't wish that on anyone.