Stitch! The Movie (2003)

Why did they have to make a sequel to Lilo and Stitch? This movie looked like the people spent a lot of time working on this. It looks like Stitch is just like a Pokemon. I can't wait until they come out with 626 experiment trading cards. I liked the evil little hamster that looked like a rabbit in this movie. I am still waiting for the day when Disney make a sequel that is better than the original movie!

While Lilo & Stich is an endearing saga, the Stich: the Movie isn't. Almost all the bits of the original is back, but it is so much flatter, so much less artistic, so much less well-paced.My wife, who loved L & S, fell asleep while watching it and for anyone that has not seen the first L & S-film it must be utterly incomprehensible.And even the animation feels rougher, and it sure lacks the deep feelings and suspense of the original, in short a typical low-budget follow-up, that supposedly links the real film with the TV-series (which I have not seen).

I've never been too impressed with the Disney video sequels. And while "Stitch, the Movie" isn't as good as the original, it's still very good. Also, it sets up the Lilo and Stitch TV series which is even better than the movie! Both "Stitch" and the TV series share the same duel level of humor that make it attractive to both kids and adults. You will see the references and homages to works like Monty Python and other classic humor sources. I haven't enjoyed a cartoon like this since Animaniacs, and it's no wonder since some of the same voices (and maybe writers) are used.I've seen some negative references in reviews made to Pokemon. Well, that's only a tangental similarity in my opinion. The only negative opinions that I agree with are that Nani has turned into the stereotypical adult figure in kid's shows that doesn't believe the kid until it's too late. On the plus side, the characters of Pleakley, Jumba, Gantu and the new Hamsterviel are much improved.So, watch the movie, and then watch the TV show!

This movie was about the worst of the Disney sequels. I've come to expect the next to crayon-drawing graphics, the total absence of background scenery, the complete loss of depth to the characters and the inane story lines from Disney sequels, but this one wins the old "Fickle Finger of Fate" award from Rowan & Martin's "Laugh-In."It was worse than all that. It was a major disappointment. It lost every inch of the charm the original had, and really was a monumental waste of my time and money in purchasing this lamoid piece of garbage.Stitch was as badly drawn as anything on a 5 year old's mother's refrigerator; worse even, as were the other characters, scenery, architecture and backdrops in this "animation." (when they bothered to ADD backdrops)This was such a disappointment, I was too mad at it to rate it until this late hour. (got it at 12:01 midnight last nite at WalMart)This movie seriously hurt my feelings. I loved Lilo and Stitch. Just loved it. I was SO disappointed. This "movie" rates a 0.00/10 from...the Fiend :.