Mara Maru (1952)

Copyright 12 May 1952 by Warner Bros Pictures, Inc. New York opening at the Warner: 23 April 1952. U.S. release: 3 May 1952. U.K. release (in a 91-minute version): 11 August 1952. Australian release: 8 January 1953. Sydney opening at the Park (ran 2 weeks). 98 minutes. SYNOPSIS: A deep-sea diver, engaged in salvage operations in the Philippines, is the only person who knows the exact location of a sunken treasure. NOTES: Despite the hic-cup of Captain Fabian, Flynn's next movie, Mara Maru, did quite good business in Australia. Locations in Los Angeles and Newport Harbors, Catalina Island and San Fernando Mission (doubling for a Manilla cathedral).COMMENT: The trouble with Mara Maru is not so much its plot - or even its less than lavish budget - but its dialogue. Talk, talk, talk. True, Douglas and Burks do their best. The picture is always most attractively atmospheric to look at, even at its dullest and most garrulous. Yes, there's a bit of action certainly, but not enough. Too much aural padding, not enough real tension. Not enough conflict and roundness in the characters either, despite marvellous efforts by sterling players, particularly Burr (one of our favorite villains), to give them life. A special hand-clap for Michael Ross as Big China. Flynn himself is adequate enough. His fights are staged with convincing doubles. Miss Roman makes for okay decoration, but strikes few sparks. Mara Maru is one of Douglas's most fluent films. The photography, as stated, is remarkably skillful too, giving the sets an obvious luster that in less talented hands they wouldn't have. Editing is smooth, though judicious trimming would not go amiss. A pity to see so much craftsmanship wasted on such an empty script. The plot has promise but the end result is neither sufficiently witty nor dry. And what's worse, it takes far too long to make its points. OTHER VIEWS: Despite some underwater scenes with obviously double-exposed, transparent fish and seemingly endless close-ups of Flynn in his diving helmet, this is an action-full melodrama with good performances and solid direction (Gordon Douglas). N. Richard Nash's screenplay does not treat Miss Roman too kindly as most of her dialogue is pretty dull. She is better served by photographer Robert Burks. Max Steiner's music score is one of his most pedestrian. - JHR writing as Charles Freeman.

Yes, Errol Flynn looks more than his 43 years here...but not that much more...more like 48. So I don't buy all those comments that he had turned into an old man. He still had about 7 years more of making films in him before his early death at age 50.What is noticeable is how his star had fallen. It's not that this is a bad picture. In fact, it's a pretty decent mystery-adventure film. But, it's a far cry from the glory days of "The Adventures Of Robin Hood" and "That Forsythe Woman", and Ruth Roman was no Olivia de Havilland or Greer Garson.Nevertheless, the main cast does rather nicely. Here, Errol Flynn looks like the kind of man who might have stayed in the Philippines after the war, lived a tough life, and ended up deep sea diving. And the diction -- always one of his strong points -- remained. Ruth Roman, though a B picture actress, was a good B picture actress, and does very well here as the wife of Flynn's partner. Raymond Burr always did nicely as a heavy (no pun intended), and does nicely here; he really was quite good. And Paul Picerni as a PI, adds a nice touch.The plot is pretty straight-forward. There's a treasure to be had (dating from WWII) and the men who are after it are not to be trusted. When Flynn's partner (one of two men who knew the location of a diamond treasure) is murdered, it falls to Flynn to work his way through the intrigue to find the treasure and the murderer. There are enough twists and surprises to keep you involved, and I very much enjoyed this pic. Recommended

Errol Flynn plays "Mason" co-owner of a salvage operstion based in Manila.His partner ,Callahan ,is a drunk who claims that he has the key to a fortune in lost diamonds ,sunk on board a vessel fleeing Manila before the Japanese occupation.When he is murdered suspicion falls on Mason especially when it becomes clear there is a mutual attraction between him and Callahan's widow (Ruth Roman ).Cleared of murder by the testimony of a private eye ,Ranier (well played by Paul Picerni)he is hired by the wealthy Benedict (Raymond Burr )to track down the treasure. The scene is set for betrayal ,shipwreck and a lively climax in the catacombs under Manila Cathedral. The movie sags a little in the underwater scenes which are murky and uninvolving but overall its a lively if minor thriller albeit one in which the ravages of the star's off screen debauchery are reflected in Flynn's appearance and slightly weary performance.Burr is admirable as the heavy and Roman is fine like most of the cast while the Max Steiner score is a big bonus.Good time passer but a long way from the stars glory days.

[Contains some minor spoilers about first 30 minutes of movie]Mara Maru, one of Errol Flynn's more mediocre movies, is obviously an attempt to cash in on the success of the B movies of the time, what we now call film noir, while attempting to add a twist of the usual Flynn style (i.e. a swashbuckler). The early part of the movie is almost an exact copy of the opening of The Maltese Falcon - the main character (in this case Flynn's) partner is murdered, he meets with hostile police, a past love affair with partner's wife is revealed, and then he meets with various mysterious villains who offer to help him towards large bundles of cash, if only he will acquire something for them.The mix isn't successful, with the noir element dominating most of the time, although the adventure quotient ups a bit later on. The problem with this is that Errol Flynn is great at being the charming rogue, but really not very convincing as the threatening Bogie-noir "man with a dark past" type. Indeed, no one is very convincing in this movie, most of the actors seeming like "Will work for food" types; moreover the plot proceeds much too slowly and ploddingly, and occasionally lapses into sentimentally, which has no place even in pseudo-noir. There are none of the directorial touches usually associated with noir movies either.Mara Maru is not an awful movie, merely boring and a waste of time; there are thousands upon thousands of movies your time would be better spent watching than this one. I'd recommend instead checking out either some of Flynn's much superior full-blown swashbucklers like The Sea Hawk, The Adventures of Don Juan, or The Adventures of Robin Hood; or some full-blown noirs, like The Maltese Falcon or Touch of Evil.