UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

Below the Sea

Below the Sea (1933)

March. 28,1933
|
6
|
NR
| Adventure

A wealthy woman funds an underwater expedition to explore for marine life, but what she doesn't know is that her "colleagues" have other intentions.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

MartinHafer
1933/03/28

While "Below the Sea" is a relatively low-budget film and Ralph Bellamy seems oddly cast as a real rogue, this is a dandy adventure film--one I almost gave an 8. But, occasional lapses (such as the doll that was used in underwater shots in an aquarium full of gold fish or a small octopus!) keep me from giving it a higher score because of a few rough edges.The film begins with a prologue where a German sub is sunk in 1917. However, two members of the crew survive--and they know that the sunken ship was carrying gold! Here is where you get an idea of what sort of hard-edged film it is--as the Captain shoves the only other survivor off a cliff in order to preserve this secret! Many years pass and the Captain is working to get a diver who can help him retrieve the treasure. The man he gets, Steve (Ralph Bellamy), is a real creep--and the slimy pair also work with a nasty dame to get the gold. But, this expedition is doomed and the ship sinks! A few years pass. Now, the Captain and Steve try another approach--they latch on to a scientific expedition funded by an unusual heiress (Fay Wray) and you'll just have to see what happens next yourself.There was a lot to like in the film. As I mentioned above, there is a real hard edge to the film you just won't find in Post-Code films (films made after mid-1934)--when Hollywood was forced to make its films more family friendly. I like this edge--particularly at the incredibly cool (and rather gruesome) ending! I also loved that for once Fay Wray was given a real decent part--not some screaming lady or bubble-head but a woman who is all woman! Well worth your time.

More
Michael_Elliott
1933/03/29

Below the Sea (1933) ** (out of 4) A German sub goes down carrying gold during WW1 and years later the commander (Fredrik Vogeding) and a scuba diver (Ralph Bellamy) head back to see if they can locate the treasure. The two exploit a woman (Fay Wray) who believes they are just going to sea to use a new diving bell, which can help them discover new things on the ocean floor. This film is pretty damn bland and boring but it does have a couple great sequences including the ending, which goes from camp to high adventure as a gigantic octopus attacks the diving bell and Bellamy must fight it. Seeing this fake looking octopus fighting Bellamy is worth sitting through the 78-minute running time. Also worthy is a great sequence out at sea where a ship gets caught in a storm but the opening sinking of the sub is also handled very well. All three actors deliver fine performances but the screenplay really lets them down because all they do is constantly fight, argue and make up and this gets very tiresome very quickly.

More
Neil Doyle
1933/03/30

Even though BELOW THE SEA is an antique of a movie made in pre-code 1933, it's nice to note that there was a feistier side to FAY WRAY than the Scream Queen exhibited in KING KONG. She still has the same beauty but it's a little less innocent this time as she plays flirtatious games with RALPH BELLAMY as an underwater diver whom she can't get to smile or act like a gentleman. That seems to be her main preoccupation here, although she is bankrolling an underwater expedition while being deceived by men who are actually after some sunken gold bullion.I thought she was prettier as the innocent blonde of KING KONG, but is presented here as a more modern and calculating heroine who learns the truth about the expedition only after she's fallen in love with Bellamy. But by this time he's been given some underwater heroics to do in order to save her life, just in time for a happy ending.It's watchable but there are crude reminders that this is an early "talkie". It's easy to see why Bellamy never became leading man material in the Hollywood of the '40s after some leading man roles in films like this. He tries hard to play the sort of role that Bruce Cabot could have done blindfolded, but his loutish behavior seems more like a forced act.Wray is lovely but not quite as effective as she was in her most famous film. Fans of the actress will be the ones who can appreciate this early offering.

More
arthursward
1933/03/31

Having made it a point to see all the available Fay Wray films that have survived, I can tell you with certainty that you will never see her looking more beautiful than in her role, here. A radiant presence in a world of dangerous characters, she plays a moneyed adventuress bankrolling a 'scientific' expedition to document marine life. Unknown to her is the real purpose of her crews' intentions. Surprises abound in this 'A' title from Columbia Pictures. I had a hard time telling the full scale from the miniature set. And for humor, Fay lectures Ralph Bellamy about becoming a gentleman, as he descends a ladder, and she'll lean WAAYY over to make sure she has his attention. Another delight from the pre-code era. Highly recommended.

More