UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Comedy >

The Adventurous Blonde

The Adventurous Blonde (1937)

November. 13,1937
|
6.4
| Comedy Mystery Romance

The third of nine Torchy Blane movies. Angry that police detective Steve McBride (Barton MacLane) is giving preferential treatment to his reporter-fiancée, Torchy Blane (Glenda Farrell), reporters from a rival newspaper plan a fake murder with the idea that Torchy's paper will print the story and look foolish. The tables are turned when the fake murder turns out to be the genuine article.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Michael_Elliott
1937/11/13

The Adventurous Blonde (1937) *** (out of 4) The third film in the series has Torchy Blane (Glenda Farrell) and Lt. MacBride (Barton MacLane) soon to be married, which drives her fellow reporters crazy because they feel she'll get all the scoops. To get even with her they get a famous actor needing publicity to pretend to be murdered so that Torchy will report the story and then get in trouble. The tables turn however when the actor ends up murdered just the way the joke was supposed to happen. This third film in the series is actually the best up to this point thanks in large part to the cast doing a fine job but the story here is also extremely well-done with a couple nice twists at the end. The idea of a "joke" murder getting into the newspaper is a bit far-fetched but I really thought this was rather fun at the start of the picture. The jealousy of the male reporters was quite funny but once the murder takes place things get a lot more serious. As someone who watches every "B" murder/mystery that comes on TCM, I must admit that the story here was quite good and especially the various suspects and their connection to the victim. Farrell and MacLane are both at the top of their game here with the chemistry flying high. Anne Nagel, George E. Stone and Tom Kennedy are all good in their supporting bits as is Anderson Lawler, , Leyland Hodgson and Virginia Brissac. The twist at the end is something I won't give away but I serious doubt anyone will see it coming.

More
kidboots
1937/11/14

In 1937 Glenda Farrell was finally given her own series that completely suited her snappy and sassy personality. She was Torchy Blane and the series kicked off with "Smart Blonde" (a very apt title). "Adventurous Blonde" was the third but didn't keep up the high standard that the first programmer had started unfortunately. Farrell being Torchy was always two jumps ahead of Lt. Steve McBride (the gravel voiced Barton MacLaine) who in spite of the fact that they were supposed to be sweethearts, seemed to have a love/hate relationship going on. In the first movie, Wini Shaw was the main lady, in this one it was Natalie Moorehead, who in 1937 may have elicted a "I seem to recall that name" but now with the accessibility of pre-code movies conjures up (to me anyway) a sophisticated "other woman"!! Heroines could not neglect their man if Natalie Moorehead was in the cast!!!Here she plays Theresa Gray, who, while on a cross country train trip, is given the wrong wire by a porter. Sitting next to her is Torchy Blane - ace reporter - who happens to get her wire which is a callous message advising Theresa that Harvey Hammond is through with her!! McBride and Torchy are almost married but as his superior points out to him - "you haven't done anything for two weeks but run around acting like a love sick kid"!!! Torchy's reporter colleagues want to play a trick on her - so they invent a hoax murder involving a ham actor, Harvey Hammond, the only problem is he actually turns up dead!!!The suspects (of which there are many) are rounded up - Hugo, the butler (Anderson Lawler), Miss Brown, the nurse (Anne Nagel) and Aunt Jenny, a bed ridden invalid (Virginia Brissac) but Torchy soon realises that she is as sprightly as anyone in the house. In this confused mystery everyone is playing a part - Hugo and Miss Brown are actors who were in on the hoax and Aunt Jenny was in reality Harvey's wife who was fed up with his philandering ways.Although it was interesting to see a very youthful William Hopper long before his Perry Mason days, I agree with the other reviewers it definitely wasn't up to the first in the series. Poor Glenda didn't seem quite so adventurous in this one - it seemed to be top heavy with comedy and the murder and sleuthing took a back seat.

More
gridoon2018
1937/11/15

Leonard Maltin calls this film one of the better entries in the Torchy Blane series, but I think it is easily the worst one out of the first three at least. The premise that sets the plot in motion (rival reporters staging a fake murder to discredit Torchy and delay her wedding to Steve) is dated at best, stupid at worst (is a hoax like that worth risking your job at the very least, and possibly spending a few years behind bars?). The crime plot itself begins with a classic setup of the genre (the "fake" murder happens for real), but soon gets muddled, not helped by the fact that two important female characters look so much alike. One very funny line, though: - humming Gahagan: "How do you like my execution?" - angry reporter: "I'm in favor of it!". *1/2 out of 4.

More
MartinHafer
1937/11/16

This is the 3rd film of the Torchy Blane series and once again Glenda Farrell and Barton MacLane are in the leads once again. The film begins with the Lieutenant (MacLane) getting a slight dressing down by his boss. It seems that since Torchy is the lieutenant's fiancée, she gets an inside scoop of crimes that other newspaper people are now complaining about--after all, should the Lieutenant's girl get stories that no other reporter has access to? In addition, the reporters decide to play a trick on the couple to get revenge--they'll stage a fake murder and make them look like idiots when they investigate. The problem is that this fake murder turns out to be a real one--and once again, Torchy gets the scoop.Throughout the film, Torchy takes the law into her own hands--making guesses and playing hunches again and again. And, since this IS a Torchy Blane film, you know that all of it will work out in the end. Unfortunately, compared to the earlier Torchy Blane films, this one more contrived and less believable. Enjoyable, sure--just not particularly outstanding in its execution.

More