Star Trek (2009)

Fans of sci-fi movies in general will enjoy this movie, even with no prior knowledge of the history of Star Trek. Unfortunately IMDb has to allow reviews from everyone including the pathetic people who believe NOTHING can be as entertaining as the "original" with it's cheesy so called special effects. If those keyboard warriors hate the remakes so much, then why aren't THEY the ones making them? Oh wait, it's because they lack the talent and vision!People, if you haven't seen this movie, take the time to do so! Do you honestly think the original Spok would've wanted to be in this movie if it didn't have his seal of approval?

JarJar Assbrams! Stop this!I have NO Idea what StarTrek is You have NO Idea, what Physiks ist and you have NO plan, what you can do in Space, and what NOT! Idiot!

Skip to bottom for TLDRWhilst i didn't think this was a horrible movie, quite the contrary it was a good film, but a horrible "Star Trek" film.Just like in the hobbit, they have to introduce some idiotic/illogical love story. The Hobbit and LOTR lore basically elves and dwarves hated each other and would never, ever of fallen in love. Elves were beautiful beings, whilst the dwarves were not. In the Hobbit they decide to have about 4 Dwarves and the rest are basically small humans. Purely to fit this stupid love story.Same in Star Trek, Spock is more human and guess what? He has a girlfriend.. PLEASE!!! In the classic original Star Trek, Spock was basically incapable of having a girlfriend and was still learning his human emotions well into what would be considered his 50's. Imo they completely ruined his beautiful character and everything that made him Spock. Like most modern remakes, they do not make them for the fans. Knowing that the fans will automatically go to see these movies when they come out. They direct the movie at everyone else. Your mainstream society of movie goers that will watch any mindless dribble as long as it has CGI and a bit of stupid humor.I thought the actors done a fantastic job considering the script. It's not their fault most of the characters were ruined, they played their parts very well.I probably won't watch these movies again. But as i have said many times before. Rating this movie 1 star just says that you are beyond salty. Yes, it's a bad Star Trek film but as a movie it is still worth higher than 1 star. Again all i see is 1/10 or 10/10. People either love or hate movies there seems to be very few in between.TLDR Logically, i have given this a 6 due to it being a decent "Action" film. Whilst also being a horrible Star Trek film. 100% aimed at your common movie lovers that will watch anything with a bit of CGI, action, illogical love stories and stupid humor. This has become the trademark of modern remakes. They have proven to make more money as they are aimed at everyone rather than the fans that made the original movies/series a hit. Same with books. They ruin books by changing them into stupid movies purely ignoring the fact that without the original fans. It would never of made it to the big screen in the first place.

Kirk (Chris Pine) is the deliciously evil villain. That role is solidified early on when he steals and destroys his father's classic red Stingray. Nothing is bad enough to happen to this obnoxious character. Never before have I stood up and cheered when a villain got the daylights beat out of him, over and over again. Other than that, there's nothing redeemable about the movie. It's full of confusion and chaos. It's constant sensory overload quickly leads boredom. The deus ex machina conclusion confirms this film as a boom.