I Am Wrath (2016)

Putting aside, the bad reviews, it's definitely on the list, if you like vengeance movies.

This is a revenge movie and not a bad one to boot. Tad slow - it's takes our hero, played by John Travolta a full 26 minutes to get it into his head - "it's down to him." Travolta plays a realistic vigilanti yet his wig is so obviously bad it reduces his commanding performance. You would think they could have upped the spend on our hero's hairpiece....!!Expect the normal fast (ish) revenge movie, with little thought provoking narrative or romantic aspect. I did ask myself... shouldn't Travolta be doing better produced and higher budget movies by now ?

Stanley (Travolta) is just a regular working man with a wife, daughter and grandson. Or so it would seem. When his wife Vivian (De Mornay) is killed in an assault in a Fatal Combat-style parking lot situation, he falls back on his Special Ops training so he can track down the baddies responsible. He ends up re-teaming with his old buddy Dennis (Meloni) because the streets of Ohio are too dangerous to navigate alone. Even though they are both highly-trained professionals with an arsenal of guns and knives at their disposal, they didn't count on one thing...that there's a conspiracy that goes all the way to the top. Now having to fight off drug dealing goons, corrupt cops and the like is not enough. Our heroes will have to face the Mr. Big at the top...but who is it? Falling back on the old-time religion, a kindly priest gives Stanley a bible, and it just happens to open to a page declaring I AM WRATH. Stanley decides to take it as a sign and exerts all his wrath on the baddies! But can he save what remains of his family? Find out today...Since Travolta doesn't do many action movies, we liked to think of this as a sequel to Chains of Gold. Maybe "I Am Scott Barnes" doesn't have quite the same ring to it, but it didn't stop us from imagining what Barnes's life might be like 25 years later. We were happy with what we saw - I Am Wrath might not be the most original movie to come down the pike, but who really cares? As long as the filmmakers stick to what works in the revenge movie format, there are no problems. Thankfully, here they do. What could have been a disaster is in actuality is a crowd-pleasing winner that delivers the goods. You truly get Travolta (and Meloni) unleashed, and as such the kill count is much higher than Scott Barnes ever dared to go for. Besides our beloved revenge movies, another thing we always love seeing is older heroes laying the smacketh down on young punks. It truly was a joy watching the 62-year-old Travolta shooting, stabbing, and beating up the young whippersnappers. Director Russell, last heard from on the site when we reviewed his Eraser (1996), clearly learned from his time working with Schwarzenegger - keep the pace snappy, and make sure you have a charismatic lead hero. That's what separates Travolta from someone like a Seagal, who has appeared in similar projects as this one. Travolta has charisma. As does Christopher Meloni (AKA Stabler), so when they're together, sparks really fly. And there's no stupid, annoying bickering or some sassy little kid to get in the way of all the awesome revenge action. It's really a winner all around. If this movie had come out anytime between, say 1996 and 2004, it would have gone to theaters. But because Hollywood exclusively makes superhero movies now, everything non-spandex-related gets bumped down to On Demand, Netflix, or Redbox. That's no longer a stigma. Of course, we've been celebrating DTV movies since day one, so it's never been a stigma for us, but generally speaking, just because DeNiro or Travolta, or anyone else, ends up on some streaming service doesn't mean their career is floundering like it used to mean in the past. It just means Hollywood has no time for them anymore because they're preoccupied with the capes-and-tights brigade. I Am Wrath shows you can make small, quality product that comes directly into your home and still has A-list talent involved. This appears to be the future of entertainment, so let's all prepare for that. Finally, it should be noted that Dennis's hideout and front is a barbershop. This of all things probably presented a dilemma for Stanley (or should we say Travolta), seeing as his hair is not real. So he gets a shave instead. How convenient. It's unlikely Dennis could have lifted the wig off, then placed it back on and then called that a haircut. Travolta should have done like he did in From Paris With Love (2010), and gotten rid of the hairpiece altogether. It might have added to the overall grit of the movie. In the end, I Am Wrath is well worth seeing and should really please revenge movie buffs.

I understand that when an "A" list Hollywood actor like John Travolta gets to be the age he's currently at, the amount of high quality roles being offered to these actors goes down sharply. Still, I feel that Travolta could have found a better movie project than "I Am Wrath". While Travolta does a better job than some other former "A" list actors his age or older (like Steven Seagal) would have done in his role, all the same he is terribly miscast. Travolta can act, but he has a "nice" demeanor that doesn't fit a character who is a former black ops agent. A bigger problem, however, is how predictable the script is. You'll be able to guess in the first ten or so minutes what the so-called "big surprise" is that will eventually be revealed. Despite the miscasting and the predictable script, the movie might have worked with expert action sequences, but director Chuck Russell can't make these sequences anything better than routine. The only really good thing about the movie is the casting of Christopher Meloni as Travolta's buddy; Meloni gives his scenes some well-need spark and life, helping the movie to become (barely) endurable... though don't take that as a recommendation.