Marguerite (2015)

Biographical films can be really good and intriguing when done well, and there are a number of great ones out there as well as a few disappointing ones.There are better biopics overall than 'Marguerite', and there is a preference for 2016's 'Florence Foster Jenkins', also about a notoriously bad singer and one of my personal favourites of 2016. However, it is very much a winner with many fantastic things.'Marguerite' does fall too much in mawkish and slightly heavy-handed melodrama in the final act, and the aspiring young singer subplot doesn't slot into place as much as it should. Same with a few of the characters, some more interesting and serving more purpose to the story than others.However, 'Marguerite's' pros far outweigh the cons, and when the film is at its best it's very good indeed and often even better than that. It's lovingly filmed and lavishly staged with gorgeous settings, scenery, colours and costumes that capture the era brilliantly and evocatively. The music is magnificent even when it's butchered.Xavier Giannoli clearly put a lot of thought into the direction and handles the themes and any tone shifts and the numerous sub-plots often very well indeed, succeeding in keeping the story compelling and not feeling cluttered or too stretched. The script is intelligent with an ideal balance of humour and pathos, the humour very funny and the pathos heart-rending.Like with 'Florence Foster Jenkins', it is easy making this sort of character interesting or easy to sympathise with and oddly wanting them to succeed. 'Marguerite' actually does a great job with that. This is also largely down to the lead performance of Catherine Frot, which is truly superb and captivates the viewer throughout the length. The rest of the performances are also very impressive, but it's Frot who lives in the memory the most.On the whole, lavish, intelligent and absorbing, Frot and the production values particularly coming off well. With a stronger final act and more consistently with a couple of the sub-plots and the characters it could have been a wonderful film instead of an overall very good one. 8/10 Bethany Cox

I wish i could follow French films without subtitles. Alas that is not one of my skills, yet i got so lost in this so very off beat period piece and it's magnificent central performance from a simply marvellous Catherine Frot, a superb talent unknown to me until now,that the subtitles somehow vanished from my consciousness.I will give nothing away except to say it is set and lavishly so among the idle rich of France immediately after the end of the great war which must of been a very bitter time after so much loss of life and limb for so little, and a time little covered by film makers. A very well made little film that rewards patience.

From correspondence I've had over the years it seems that there are roughly a dozen people who tend to follow my reviews here and they will know in what high esteem I hold Catherine Frot, not least for her versatility which allows her to move effortlessly from the pathetically ditzy neglected wife in Un Air de famille to the mother from hell in Vipere au poing with virtually any and everything in between. Her first love is the stage - indeed she made her name in the stage version of Un Air of famille, which earned her a Moliere, plus a Cesar when she replicated her role, complete with dog collar, on celluloid - and for three years she has neglected the cinema for the theatre - I myself was lucky enough to see her in the Ingrid Bergman role in Cactus Flower (Fleur de cactus in French) barely a week ago, but now she is back on the screen in what I can only describe as a tour de force; Marguerite is a wealthy socialite in 1920s Paris who has an all consuming love for opera, so much so that she loves nothing better than performing arias for her society friends in salons. The problem, tragedy may not be too strong a word, is that she is totally without vocal talent yet for reasons best known to themselves her friends conspire to keep this knowledge from her and applaud every note and even pen fine reviews. Although the story is fiction - there may be a reason the character is named Marguerite Dumont; the actress Margaret Dumont, was the foil for Grouch Marx in the majority of the Marx Brothers films and was also a wealthy society lady with delusions of grandeur - it is clearly based on the life of Florence Foster Jenkins a wealthy American who also harboured the delusion that she was a world-class diva. Catherine Frot is outstanding and it may well be the finest performance she has given in the cinema, which is, of course, saying something. For some reason it appears that Meryl Streep is shooting very much the same story even as I write and this may well keep the Frot film off American - and possibly even UK - screens which would be unforgivable.

Marguerite is inspired by the true story of Florence Foster Jenkins, a rich woman who loves so much opera she thinks she is a great soprano. And she sings in small salons or recital halls for a confidential audience, getting good articles in musical publications, written by friends of course. Catherine Frot is the perfect actress to perform this naive and touching opera lover, unconscious of her lack of talent. She is just so natural that we have immediate sympathy for her. But not for her family circle who, in that weird situation, did not help her, especially her husband who deserts her and her butler who manipulates her "talent", everybody laughing around. Some changes have been made from the true story : Florence is now Marguerite (maybe in reference at Marguerite Gautier? See the last part), and the end of her life was different. But it is a great vision of that pathetic situation. There always have been art lovers who naively think they are genius, remember Ed Wood. Just wait Stephen Frears version , with Meryl Streep in the role of Florence (whose other first name was Narcissa) ...