Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup (2009)

Well we obviously have a graduate from the Micheal Moore School of Documentaries here. This is the biggest piece of crap I have watched that wasn't his. I would say this is full of lie after lie but that wouldn't be true...they sprinkle in some half truths and a lot of "Huh? what's that got to do with anything?" You can't really blame them though, as when your premise is so absurd it doesn't leave you a lot to work with. They even go to the steel doesn't melt absurdity(how is it made then you genius). Two pictures of "the same area", but having completely different landmarks. Lies of when Bush was told about the towers falling, omissions of important facts like the short times the flights were in the air(by design), explosions from the "bottom of the buildings" while they show video of the buildings falling from the top(take a physics class moron), an "interview" with someone from the Department of Agriculture that supposedly had an odd conversation with one of the hijackers that was never reported(and no video of her saying any of it), and a general naiveté of life in general. They quote few to none of their "sources", except the left wing nut jobs that have the same no proof that they have. This is a slap in the face to anyone with common sense, the people that died on that horrible day, their families, and to be honest the United States of America. They should be ashamed of themselves, and should not claim to be Americans. This work of fiction could be considered a comedy, as most of it is so laughable, if it weren't for the screaming you will do at the TV for being insulted, and the huge crap they take on America and the families affected. A don't mind a dissenting view in a documentary or otherwise, but it should be at least close to fact based. This lacks anything that could be considered fact, and leaves you scratching your head wondering if anyone is dumb enough to believe any of this to the point of putting this mindless drivel on film and releasing it. Please, if you watch this, use your brain on the pathetic obvious things, and do research on the rest before you look as dumb as these film makers in public.

With Zero and Core of Corruption An American Coup is one of the best films that debunks the official stories of what happen on 9/11. Puts the lie to the "Official Story," which has changed in every major facet a multitude of times, so it must be spoken of in the plural. American Coup retrieves from the memory hole the many eyewitness testimonies which contradict the official lies.Contrary to the nonsense about how many people would have to be involved to cover up the truth the film explains how compartmentalization is used in black ops. Facts are what matter and the facts can not be explained away by denying it would be impossible for such a coup could take place. It did take place contrary to misinformation from the accessories after the fact in the corporate media.The movie points out that the Vietnam war was started by a lie. Ignorance is no excuse to deny the overwhelming evidence of government complicity in 9/11. Core of Corruption and Zero should be companion pieces as they dissect the many "coincidences" that cant be ignored by unfurling the shadow governments favorite phrase to pretend it's crimes didn't happen, "conspiracy theory."

First of all when you watch this or if you have already, then keep one thing in mind, ... this film quite literally names countless people as being "in on it" or "having inside knowledge" including the FDNY (who risked and sacrificed their lives that day) to a BBC News Station because a reporter said the WTC7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it did. For one thing, I seriously doubt our government would let a European news station in on them being the mastermind behind the worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor. Seriously? Also, go watch the news reports again, everyone was talking about the WTC7 coming down because the firefighters heard it groaning and it was fully engulfed and had a giant chunk taken out of it. The news station misunderstood "It will come down" for "It has come down", due to how many people the news passed through on the way to the reporter. They also claim that no plane hit the pentagon and that it must have been a cruise missile despite all the eye witnesses and a number of light post that were knocked down, which could have only occurred if the missile did some serious zig zag maneuvering to hit them before striking the pentagon. I think a planes wingspan hitting them seems more logical. Go type in 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 in youtube and you will get a very clear picture of what happened. I could go on and on, but if you take some time to research yourselves then it's not hard to find the facts. However, if you want a good place to go with a great presentation of the facts then you can visit http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4 . It contains several videos closely examining the different accusations and even sheds some light on new information.

Simply put, this is the best of the Loose Change permutations so far. All the facts are laid out in clear fashion, and the music soundtrack is thankfully more subdued and muted this time around. The narration by actor Daniel Sunjata is an improvement over director Dylan Avery's sober but somewhat weak turn as narrator of the last Loose Change entry.All in all an impressive, polished presentation in terms of the look and sound, but, more importantly, it gets most of the important facts out into the forefront.Foremost amongst these facts are the findings of physicist Steven Jones - PhD, who discovered, along with his team of scientists, explosive/incendiary material in all of the samples of 9/11 dust they have acquired (over 20, from different sources, independent from one another) and how they have proved that this material is a form of highly powerful Nano Thermite which ignites at temperatures high enough to cut through steel. This material is not Sulfur as one commentator erroneously stated. It exists in the form of small chips - gray on one side, red on the other - that ignite at around 430 degrees centigrade, and produce tiny spheres of molten iron of the exact same chemical composition as molten iron produced as a by-product of ignited Thermite. Through a process termed "X-Ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy" it has been proved by Jones and his colleagues that the microscopic particles comprising the bulk of the red part of the chips are nano particles (1/1 thousandth the diameter of a human hair) of iron oxide and elemental aluminum - the exact key ingredients of Super Thermite, or Nano Thermite. This is incendiary material that can be made to be explosive when other elements such as Silicon and Carbon are added, and both of those elements were also identified by Jones, et al as being intimately mixed in with the Iron Oxide and Aluminum. Their findings have yet to be adequately refuted by any official investigative body. In fact, none of the four official investigations, including the last and "exhaustively carried out" investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology even bothered to look at the dust, nor did they even consider any hypothesis other than collapse due to damage and fire, even though it is required by law to test for explosives in any fire investigation. Some investigation.So we have a material found in all the dust samples that consists of the exact ingredients of a known material that can cut through steel, that ignites at 430 degrees centigrade, and that produces molten iron spheres as a by-product just like Thermite, but it is not Thermite? If this were not enough, we have pools of molten metal at the bases of all three buildings six weeks after their collapse, and video showing molten metal literally pouring out of the south tower beginning five minutes before it's collapse, and the molten metal looks absolutely and positively like the molten iron produced by Thermite (go to YouTube and type in "Thermite 9/11" to see for yourself). A fact totally ignored by defenders of the official story is that the heat produced by the fires did not exceed 800 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature far too low to even weaken steel let alone melt it. It seems that they never let the facts get in the way of their faith in the official dogma.Then there is the testimony of Housing Authority official Barry Jennings, who along with another man by the name of Michael Hess were witnesses to massive explosions inside WTC Seven before either tower had collapsed. As if things were not suspicious enough, Jennings died suddenly last August, two days before the final NIST report on the collapse of WTC Seven was released (NIST said it was due solely to fire - yeah, sure) - it goes on and on and on and on.Attacks on this documentary, and the whole 9/11 "truth movement" in general, are becoming increasingly ineffectual, indeed embarrassing in light of what we now know.Dylan Avery and everyone involved in this production are on the right side of history and will be vindicated, in due time, along with all other unbelievers of the official story. Good for them.