UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

Jurassic Park III

Jurassic Park III (2001)

July. 18,2001
|
5.9
|
PG-13
| Adventure Action Thriller Science Fiction

In need of funds for research, Dr. Alan Grant accepts a large sum of money to accompany Paul and Amanda Kirby on an aerial tour of the infamous Isla Sorna. It isn't long before all hell breaks loose and the stranded wayfarers must fight for survival as a host of new -- and even more deadly -- dinosaurs try to make snacks of them.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Tango and Cash
2001/07/18

Wow, how the mighty have fallen. The original was a masterpiece, the sequel was a fun Jeff Goldbloom cheesefest (in a good way!), but the third entry is, quite simply, trash. "Let's just keep going, keep makin' 'em" was the philosophy; purely a money-making adventure for the production company, no desire for quality. The movie is so bad that it took another 14 years for them to try to make another one. That says a lot.The script is incompetent and the characters are irritating. We just keep wishing one of the main characters would get eaten alive like the minor characters do. There's nothing redeeming about them - nothing redeeming about Sam Neill either. Close-up shots of him looking at things in his character's annoying way gets really annoying. We get it, come on. The milking of CGI dino fights is egregious. Yes, sequels usually resort to "overdoing" the original (for example, Alien/Aliens), but this was just ridiculous. Relying on CGI as the primary plot vehicle will never work, and it reveals the cheap, gimmicky nature of the movie. I could have given this turkey a 2 out of 10 simply for the film's last line - "Let's go home". Boooooo!!!! Booooooooooo!!!

More
aaronogren
2001/07/19

There are a couple reasons as to why this movies deserves a far better rating than what it has received. #1 The people reviewing it expected the magic that the first movie in the sequel brought. If you remove the first two movies from your mind this movie is very high quality and definitely doesn't deserve a 1/10, like a lot of these people gave it. #2 It was a fun, action packed movie that did what it set out to do, be enjoyable. Overall, this movies was good and deserves a higher rating than what it was given. 6.8/10

More
Lucas André
2001/07/20

The movie was good to see what they shouldn do in the next sequel..

More
cinemajesty
2001/07/21

Movie Review: "Jurassic Park III" (2001)In season 2000/2001 executive producer Steven Spielberg passed on the directing efforts in the "Jurassic Park" movie series to director Joe Johnston, who had been received notices with the special-effect-spectacle "Jumanji" (1995). In this third installment of an highly-successful first film "Jurassic Park" directed by Steven Spielberg in season 1992/1993, where computer-generated-imagery (CGI) got its stakes in movie-making over the former stop-motion-techniques from the early days of fantasy-action with "King Kong" (1933) produced and directed by Merian C. Cooper (1893-1973). "Jurassic Park III" does establish weaker thrills then "The Lost World" (1997) directed by Steven Spielberg due to an uninspired no-dinosaur opening sequence with an common 10-year-old boy and his guardian get attacked by assumingly a group of Pteranodons (Giant Bird-Like Dinosaurs), who then make the ultimate highlight of this picture in a relentless thrilling, yet-all-to-short cage fight between another stranded group led by as usual convincing leading actor Sam Neill as Dr. Alan Grant, whom unchanged character from "Jurassic Park" (1993) helps out a desperate on-off-relationship couple, fairly-emotional supporting cast portrayed by Téa Leoni and match-making William C. Macy.Everything else in this some surprises-striking Fantasy-Action-Movie for a fast-moving, no-major-drama or conflict-given despite surviving as escaping again the second island of billionaire John Hammond's Jurassic Park day-dreams, when private planes fall off the sky, the T-Rex has a death-match with an indecisive Spinosaurus of an unpleasant in-betweener dinosaur selection in missed opportunities of the up to 18% more expensive "Jurassic Park III" over its predecessor, despite the ticket-worthiness of news-bringing action scene with magnificent realistically-designed Pteranodons, when the unless suspenseful group-hunting velociraptors fall short in this one, versus the common-runaway-group of less-cared-about characters from unfinished screenplay feeling written by project-abandoning filmmakers Alexander Payne & Jim Taylor, know for collaborating on full-blown dramatic scripts for "About Schmidt" (2002) starring Jack Nicholson and "Sideways" (2004) starring Paul Giamatti.Nevertheless "Jurassic Park III" must be enjoyed as a plain Hollywood entertainment of no consequence, when it took another 14 years for executive producer Steven Spielberg at Univeral Studios-based company of Amblin Entertainment, Inc. to redeem this 85-Minute action movie in order to deliver a higher-thrills-sharing "Jurassic World" in Summer 2015.© 2018 Felix Alexander Dausend (Cinemajesty Entertainments LLC)

More