UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Horror >

Unrated: The Movie

Unrated: The Movie (2009)

October. 10,2009
|
2.3
| Horror

Frank is a filmmaker who brings a group of actresses to a cabin in the woods to make a film. While there they stumble upon a book, a book that belongs to the Book Keeper. The book is in no way an ordinary book, as it brings demons to earth, and now Frank and his actresses are the only ones to stop them. Source: horrornews.net

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

nocpan
2009/10/10

I like B movies, the are unrefined but sometimes give you that something that big Hollywood productions lack. Here we are given nothing.It is a movie about a looser director taking four actresses into an abandoned house in the middle of nowhere to film a movie with a hand held Sony handy cam. The director in the movie is the actual director of Unrated the movie and I'm quite certain that his portrayed role in the movie is quite close to the original self.I can't begin to understand how this movie came to be. Acting is very bad, dialog is as shallow as a puddle. For example "You are s**t, and you are pi$$." said by one of the "actress" to the remaining two, and this was one of the more dramatic moments of interaction. Movie looks like it has in fact been shot with a Sony HandyCam. There is no mood or tension which should be present. Sad to say, even nudity is used in crude amateur way. It did not help the movie. Even the last final battle which supposed to be dynamic, gore, blood, guts and killing just wasn't it at all.How come this looks so bad? it is as if 9th grade video club was given handful of cash and told they can hire strippers for the movie. Any attempts at giving characters some depth failed miserably. Costumes and special effects were very low budget, and since when blood bubbles like soap water? I strongly advise against watching this movie. It is just not worth wasting anyone's time. I have no idea how come it got through editing, previews and ultimately to DVD but it does not provide entertainment of any sort, you will just be frustrated that you spent hour and a half sitting and hoping it will get better somehow.

More
smcdona8
2009/10/11

I am a HUGE horror fanatic, from mainstream Hollywood movies, to big budget indie flicks to B and even C movies, and I will give any horror movie under the sun a try, so if you're a big horror fan too,you can imagine I've seen some pretty bad movies.That being said, this is probably the WORST movie I have EVER seen. Five minutes into it, I knew it was going to be bad, but I gave it a chance hoping maybe the comedy aspect or the FX would redeem it. Not only was it not even funny, but the (I admit) pretty good make-up and gore FX were limited to the last 20 minutes, and they certainly weren't good enough to make the rest of the movie worth watching. The acting was bad, there was barely a followable plot, and the worst part about everything is I think the makers of this movie really, truly tried to make a good movie. Avoid it, it's not even worthy of the 7-hundred something MB of space it took up on my hard drive. If you really, really, want to see this movie, fast-forward it through the first hour, and then it might be worth a 1-star rating. The only reason it got 1 from me is because I can't give it negative stars.

More
trashgang
2009/10/12

Rose and Schnaas, that could have been a perfect match to make some gory flick. Sadly, it didn't work out that way. What they tried to make is a hot comedy but it failed on all ways. I never had a laugh on my face and the acting was especially from Rose as wooden as it can be. It's sad that it has to go that way because they had some famous British names of the genre in it. Eileen Daly from Razor Blade Smile for example. But I must say that the best acting was for Eleanor James, somehow I like her way of acting, I have seen her before in other flicks and always I notice her in some kind of way. The gore that you suspect only comes in at 50 minutes and it's way too late. But when it comes it is indeed very messy but not to say that it would be something for the gorehounds. Another thing that I would mention is the strip act of porn star Vivian Schmitt, what that had to do with the movie, well, nothing, pure gratuitous. And talking about nudity, almost all girls show their juggs and Eleanor's ones get all the red stuff all over her. So it's a kind of boring flick, just watch the last 25 minutes and look out for Karl from Violent Sh*t. Unrated, don't know why...

More
whammy666
2009/10/13

With the joining of two great German horror legends - Andreas Schnaas and Timo Rose - you would expect the greatest film ever. However, what you do get is a movie that is just okay. And a movie where the only gore is in the last 10 minutes. And a musical number by Karl the Butcher - but that's a good thing. However, the first hour of the movie is kind of boring. Considering what the movie is, you know the fans just want gore, and it doesn't deliver till the very end. It just isn't well made or that entertaining. See it - but don't expect too much. However, Karl the Butcher vs. Axe was a definite improvement over this, and I know that these two will make many good films to come. Well, good if you like this type of thing.

More