UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Horror >

Strangers of the Evening

Strangers of the Evening (1932)

May. 14,1932
|
5
|
NR
| Horror Comedy Mystery

Bodies start mysteriously disappearing from the city morgue. An investigator tries to determine what is going on.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

mark.waltz
1932/05/14

This is a deadly dull thriller about corpses missing from a morgue and the investigation of possible murder of those AWOL stiffs. There's absolutely no action or intrigue concerning who these people are, how they died, and why they are missing in the first place. Pitts plays the girlfriend of one of the suspects (Lucien Littlefield) who is interviewed by the police. Her nervous mannerisms light up the film the minute she steps on screen, and from blinking to stay awake, I went to sudden laughter. Unfortunately, she doesn't come in until half way through the hour long film, and is only on sporadically, her presence the reason I give this a 4 (**) rather than a 1 or 2 (Bomb). Gravely voiced Eugene Palette also adds a little bit of humor, but that's simply because he plays the dumb detective so amusingly.

More
Chase_Witherspoon
1932/05/15

This murder mystery cum comedy is seriously hard work to enjoy. Talky and slow moving mystery concerns a couple of bodies turning up at the local morgue, then disappearing, with detectives seemingly bombarded by unusual suspects but no motives. Framed for the murder of one of the corpses, local Doctor (von Eltz) decides to solve the crime himself before he's wrongly arraigned.Zasy Pitts offers comic timing and a familiar hound-dog expression and urban drawl, but even her professional touch can't muster enough spark to light this drab affair. Miriam Seegar is an attractive souther belle with little more to do here than hang like the handbag that adorns her arm and deliver inane dialogue. Warner Richmond also features in a trademark role as the conniving villain.Frequent newspaper inserts substitute for the narrative, while there's the usual silhouettes and shady conspiracies to thicken the plot, alluding to much more than is eventually delivered. There's an amusing punch-up near the end, and the parallel story lines successfully connect at the film's 'all is explained' conclusion, but even at only 65 minutes, it's still a bit of a yawn.

More
jonfrum2000
1932/05/16

I'm a fan of Zasu Pitts, so then this came up on YouTube, I jumped. Zasu doesn't show up until the second half of the film - I call that false advertising. Today's audience should not expect comedy. There are scenes that hint at mild amusement, but don't expect more. It seems as if the writers came up with scenes with comic potential, but didn't know how to pay it off. 1932 was early in the talkie era, and they just hadn't worked out timing yet. There's a lot of the talk-pause acting that made the earliest talkies stiff to later audiences. I just didn't find this movie worth finishing - even when Zasu finally made her entrance.

More
adam_658
1932/05/17

I suppose it goes without saying that 1930s America is a different culture than we live in today. The humor of this movie is incredibly foreign. For the entire movie I felt like the dumb blond who doesn't understand the jokes. The plot was complicated, but all and all pretty good. The acting is pretty decent. The fight scene is laughable, the one part of the movie where I think I understood the humor. The movie is set up as a mystery and in the good parts of the movie you wonder what's going on (in a suspenseful way.) And in the bad parts of the movie you wonder what's going on (in a confused way.) The ending does a fair job of cleaning up the confusion. If one's a fan of slap-stick comedy I would say this is probably a classic, but even as one who just don't get it I can say "Strangers of the Evening" tells a good enough story to earn a 6.

More