Code 207 (2012)

They did a pretty good job, it is a little rough on editing and camera, but they were working clearly working on a budget, the writing was just as good as any studio film. And the acting good. I agree I did enjoy the play between the various characters it Tiffany and Struckmann did a pretty damn funny job at times. Well done. I understand that it was made on an extremely low budget, and some people love to compare those to large studio films, but this seems hardly fair, These guys made a good little film with a solid story. The acting was solid throughout even if the editing and camera work could have been better. and like peter said it is made to tell a serious story about a very big problem and making a film to depict it is inspiring.

I have to say I do not feel the rough critique of this film justified. Sure it is an Indie film and not of a million dollar budget. but they put effort it to it. The story line is fine but certainly they needed a bigger budget to pull it all off, ambitious but if you don't try right. The banter between the two leads, Tiffany and jack is actually pretty funny, so they did it with humor and some decent fights real guns and a solid bad guy. We cant knock them for the budget, they had what they had and made the best of it, for a indie film it is pretty good. And in 10 years some studio will see it and the people in it and do a million dollar remake to do it justice.

Good action film, 11 July 2012 10/10 Author: web hardy from United Statesit was a well thought out low budget action film it would have been better had they had a bit more money for the production and editing, but the acting is solid, a few award winning actors so no wonder. it is a low budget film sure, but for what they had they made the best of it, the story works, and inspired by real events makes it worth it the lead actors did a great job deserving of a bigger movie, and some of the new faces also. it could have paced up a little in the beginning but worth watching over a drink, there are a lot of studio films witch are worse, but for the low budget it was a good job for the budget loved the location, good choice Was the above review useful to you?0 out of 1 people found the following review useful: cool low budget action film, with a little humor and a twist, 10 July 2012 10/10 Author: vincent jones from United Statesvery low budget action film, and i have never seen anybody get that much out of that little money, so great job there. the acting was solid, and a good cast. some of the actors I know from sports and TV shows. the fight scenes looked well done, very real (im not sure they didn't hurt themselves actually) love to see Chase Stevens and Tommy Mercer I hope finally they are going to Hollywood, they did a great job. and the play between the lead Mac and Tiffany were really well done and funny moments too the editing could have been better, a bit of a slow start but I enjoyed it, good film for popcorn and a few beers. had they had a bit more money it would have been an awesome film worthy of cinema Was the above review useful to you?0 out of 1 people found the following review useful: Good little action film,, 10 July 2012 10/10 Author: sedelstein from United Statesthe idea they set out to do is solid, and the actors are good, it could have been shot a bit better and edited a bit faster, but for a popcorn film its pretty good. there is no real use of cgi or a lot of filler, its pretty much suspense and action throughout. it is a low budget film, sure, but its better then most of the low budget i have seen, great use of, pro wrestlers, and they did a great job too, a few new faces too, some of them could goo far if Hollywood finds them. the leads did a great job and should definitely be seen in bigger action films and have higher budgets i saw interview with the director talking about the storyline based on the real human trafficking going on right here in our back yard. and that makes it worth watching just on that account. Was the above review useful to you?0 out of 1 people found the following review useful: OK action film for an independent, 10 July 2012 10/10 Author: don zimmerman from United Statesit was a good little action film, sure it could have been shot and edited better, but all in all well done. the acting is better then most low budget films I have seen, the storyline starts a little slow, but comes together well in the end. based on real events should make it worth watching. the fight scenes seems very real and the play between the two leads is reminiscent of moonlighting, well done and a little funny at times, which is good as most low budget action takes itself far to serious. i would love to see what these guys can do with more money on their next film, they have the right ideas but could have done with a little more time and funding

I don't normally review movies but I felt the need to after watching this one. I was surprised to see it was only 91 minutes because I could swear it took the entire night to watch it. There are parts that absolutely don't make sense. This isn't really a spoiler but I'm going to call it a potential spoiler just in case since it is something that happens in the movie. So the hero is chasing down a moving SUV and banging on the driver side door.... The camera cuts away, comes back and all of a sudden the SUV is completely stopped instead of still moving and the hero opens the door completely catching the driver by surprise as if he was never there. It's that kind of movie for all 91 minutes. I've never seen a movie that was so bad it was just awkward to watch. I like good-bad movies on occasion but this was just terrible bad to the point that it wasn't entertaining. I battled through to the end of the movie out of necessity as if I were a marathon runner just needing to finish the race although I could barely walk. If this were a restaurant and this movie was the food I just ate, I would ask for a refund and that the entire kitchen staff be fired.