UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Action >

The Lost Angel

The Lost Angel (2005)

April. 26,2005
|
3.8
|
R
| Action Thriller

Slight off-balance police inspector Palmer (Alison Eastwood) works with Father Brian (Judd Nelson) to solve for a religion-based killer, while she deals with her teen-aged goth sister.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

cddavis49
2005/04/26

This film was on Lifetime as a World Premiere, and I really enjoyed it. I found the plot to be unpredictable, the production was very good, and I was surprised to see Alison Eastwood carry the lead. The production value was so much better than what you get from Lifetime. The locations creepy and unusual. You hardly ever see a sustainable, tough female lead. I though the Director did a great job keeping the visuals interesting. It reminds me of thrillers like seven and they way they keep you guessing all the way to the end. I tried to guess the ending, but never saw the twist coming. The film kept me guessing. It's well worth watching.

More
sth_Weird
2005/04/27

This movie has a really low rating and I only got it because Judd Nelson is in it. I very much value him as a gorgeous character actor, who unfortunately usually ends up in crappy movies. This is not his best performance, either, but it's believable and definitely better than those of some of the other cast (which wasn't brilliant but also not as bad as other people here say in my opinion). So I expected a bad movie. Surprise surprise! I liked it a lot. Yeah there are certain elements you have already seen in other movies. Which movie today does not have elements already been used? It's unavoidable. I found the movie very exciting and not predictable at all. As a matter of fact, I suspected many of the characters to be the murderer. I was looking for the clues in everything they said and did, and I enjoyed it a lot (except for this stupid and over-long love scene, it's not that love scenes bother me I actually like them when they fit in, but this one did not fit in at all it was simply pointless)! But then there came the end. I don't know how one of the other people who wrote a comment was able to predict the ending. Because I did not see it coming at all. For me, it was simply unexpected and pointless. It ruined the movie for me. I would have given it a 8/10 if somebody else did it. But this way...5/10, and I'm being very grateful here!

More
guilfisher-1
2005/04/28

To begin with this is one movie when I wanted the lead to be the next victim. Alison Eastwood, unfortunately didn't inherit any of her dad's talent. A completely unbelievable performance. I can accept anything in these bad made for TV movies on LMN, but not this one. I couldn't believe how this inept detective gets away with what she does. Taking on a man twice her size in one punch; tripping a guy with a gun. C'mon gimme a break. She plays the role with the emotional level of a minus 10. Monotone voice, blank facial expressions and absolutely no sex appeal, this was a mistake. I guess when your father's a star you get all the breaks. Everyone else in this loser I won't embarrass them by mentioning their names. I'll give them a break to help them forget this experience with Eastwood's bad acting. She can't be serious about a career. Please.

More
ark30inf
2005/04/29

The lead guy wrote it. I guess thats why the jarring switch to an unnecessary and unexplained sex scene with Allison Eastwood occurred. I would rewrite to drop that in also if I was him.I am guessing they also found out that Judd Nelson was coming onboard after the script was written and had to duct tape him in. That would explain him dropping out of the sky for no apparent reason as an FBI Priest. FBI Priest? It would also explain why his character was clueless each time he appeared and seemed purposefully written to have no impact on the plot at all, he was like the ghost of a dead career haunting this movie.This movie has an almost artistic way of leading you on to think its going to get better. A secret ancient ritual with a nude killing each day? Let's stick around! Is the ritual ever mentioned again? No. Weird cuneiform writing? Must be something weird! Lets stick around. Was it? No. Start out with babe victims and then move to old friars and old ladies. Blah. Why are these bad guys mutating into some other guy? Must be supernatural lets stick around. Was it? No. It's weird, but its a fairly watchable pointless mess.Need to explain why the Priest heard nothing...lets make him deaf. Need to have the Friar not say what he knows....lets make him a mute. Need the sister grabbed at school but the bad guy can't do it because he would be recognized....have a random guy do it who is never seen again. Need a way into a building.....create a secret tunnel and give a lame one-off explanation that has nothing to do with the plot.The acting was not that bad except at the start. In fact, the movie was starting to drag me in a little until Judd Nelson suddenly dropped out of the ceiling into the movie and jarred me back to my senses. If you want to see a watchable exposition of bad writing this will do.Why is there snow in one part of town and not elsewhere? The secret tunnel goes to the "East Forest".....but this church is downtown is it not? Why is the first bad guy washing out bloody cloth with gasoline?

More