Let's Be Evil (2016)

This was not strong with its screenplay, but visually. The story was trying to be unique and somewhat it succeeds on that. The concept was simple but it worked for the way they have made it. There are lots of colours, especially lights (as you can see from the film poster) and in particular a corridor was regularly used as its trademark. So now and then visually pleases, specifically when the suspense or tense moments arises. I would say a better film than I anticipated for a low budget like this.The kid from the recent version of 'Les Miserables' was one of the leads. There are 3-4 main characters, including one an AI. Like any recent trend in that theme, about the near future with kind of utopia setting, but in a small enclosure like in a building the entire film takes place.When three new supervisors arrive to maintain the stability in the education programme for the kids, which initially looks fine, but soon one of them started to experience some oddness around. While trying to find what, the story takes twists and turn heading towards the finale where the fate of entire institute will be decided.Those who take chances in small films should try it, but not to expect big. Without much of high-end graphics the film achieved the target quality what a standard film requires. If it was slightly well written, it would have been a cult film for sure. But some people still find it better. So I feel worth it a try when you are out of the options on choosing films to watch.6/10

THIS MOVIE is a defiled piece of trash garbage. I read a review saying that it was one of those "see it twice movies" and seeing it once has put me in the ICU. I think the writers wrote this movie at the age of 13 after their teacher, Ms. Dumb Dumb, made them read the hit novel 1984. It was as if Ms. Dumb Dumb had asked the class to write a movie, and she picked the groups. Two kids got paired up and didn't know each other so they didn't work on it until they realized that it was due the next day so they had to ask their mom and dad to drive them to Staples so they could get some poster board and glitter in order to finish the project. They got an F. This movie is an F. I hope whoever thought this movie was a good idea to make realizes they wasted a lot of time and money on a lazy, uninspired piece of film poo poo. 1/10 -Michael Douglas

Three chaperones are hired to supervise an advanced learning program for gifted children, who wear Augmented Reality Glasses to assist in their education. Contained within a secure, underground facility, events quickly spiral out of control.The film has received mixed or negative reviews, and I can absolutely see why. Even though the virtual reality parts look okay, the general appearance of the film is cheap. And much of the acting is awful (especially the really bad talking head in the opening). The concept is timely (something we might see on "Black Mirror"), but the film may be limited by its own budget.Worth a look? Sure. But not nearly as good as the sort of new releases we have come to expect from IFC Midnight. (Then again, you can't have a winner every time, can you?)

This is a typical -- watch it twice -- movie.A nice B movie with some head scratching at the end.----- SPOILER BEYOND THIS POINT ------There are small hints all the way through the movie. The Augmented Reality is the key to Questions that pop up in the first run.Keep an close eye on messages showed on the interface (glasses) they are not as random as they appear.At the end you figure out, that the "adults" are the the rats inside the lab controlled by the children. Because all they wanna do is play with their pets :D