Night of the Living Dead 3D (2006)

This is not a good movie. It has an awful ending and an awful story line. The original Night of the living dead from 1968 is a good movie. The first remake of Night of the living dead from 1990 is also a good movie. But this second remake of the Night of the living dead is not very good. The sequel to Night of the living dead Dawn of the Dead (1978) is a very good movie. The third movie Day of the Dead (1985) is also a good movie. The fourth movie Land of the dead is also a good movie. But not this movie. 3.2 is overrating it. This a bad movie. Do not waste your time. And do not waste your money. This is a very bad remake.

Only one thing might save this movie - a less important, but nevertheless lacking feature in other remakes of this classic theme - which is a relatively credible background of why and how zombies became zombies. All the other stuff: acting of both living/dead, script and continuity is so full of potholes even a mindless zombie would be crying his/her (rotting) heart out over the final product. Events are too predictable, save for the key role of the undertaker (played by Mr Sid Haig) that even steals some humor into the action. The end credits make me smile too, but alas, they'd come too late to get me feel I spent these 70 minutes of my life worthly to remember - so, try to avoid it and better re-watch the classic and Romero versions instead.

Let me start with this, every time I see someone or hear someone discussing a bad movie, if there is a reputable actor in the film, almost without fail, someone says "Why would so and so..." or "I can't believe so and so did this movie". That irritates me to no end, because it is a stupid question, usually meant rhetorically, with no expectation of a legit or relevant answer. Well I guess I'm Albert Einstein. People...Actors need to work to eat and survive. It's that simple, so don't question why Ving Rhames does Zombie Apocalypse 2012, and don't question why the great Sid Haig is in this crap-fest.Now, on to the real issue. Theft. Another filmmaker totally devoid of integrity, discovers the so-called public domain status (which myself and others whole-heartedly refute)of Night of the Living Dead and he gets a brainstorm,..oh donkey dung, did I say brainstorm?? I meant he has a brain-Fart!!! Night of the Living dead belongs to the people who created it. Someone claiming to be an artist and then stealing from other artists is disgusting. It's an outright Us VS.Them situation. And Jeff Broadstreet you have defined yourself as one of them. You make me sick.Fans and supporters of the real Night of the Living Dead...Boycott this Garbage. I give it a minus infinity out of ten. This guy made money, no one from Image Ten or the original film made squat from it.

When I saw John Russo's raping of Night of the Living dead, laughingly released as the 30th Anniversary edition, I sat back, shook my head, took the VHS out of my machine and tossed it in a corner thinking, "No one can possibly screw up what is a classic film ever again." Wow, was I wrong. I saw this horrendous abortion of a film in 2-D, since it was released to a movie theater within 500 miles of where I live. Luckily for any theater, since I would certainly have demanded my money back. This was a horrid, terrible, stupid movie. How can anyone sit around and go "Yeah, we made a winner here." This, along with Dawn of the Dead 2: Contagium and Day of the Dead (2008), should all be taken, piled up and burned, the better that no one ever remembers them ever. They should be erased from the collective memory of humanity, yes they are that bad. Acting, bad. Story (Laughable) Bad. SFX. Bad. Even the momentary nudity from an obviously enhanced woman was bad. Just do yourself a favor. Watch the original or the 1990 remake and avoid all this garbage. Your brain will thank you.