Night Fangs (2005)

I read somewhere on IMDb that one of the major faults of this film is that 'Vampires don't behave like that..' I had to laugh. Know many Vampires do you?Anyway the film. Its clearly zero budget, the picture and sound quality is not the greatest but I must admit I did enjoy it in the end. Two lesbians are trying to follow a legend around bathing in a virgins blood so they can become immortal and what happens is that everything goes apesh*t and the victim becomes a Vampire who turns the two killers into Vamps too. The victims boyfriend and his friends try to help by getting the local professor (who is also the Director) involved - but end up get stalked by the Vamps.The movie starts slowly and because of the budget as well almost made me switch off, however I am glad I stuck with it. There are many scenes that do work, the Vampires are quite cool at times and you can see influences from classic horror such as Salems Lot. The teens are quite natural and there is some funny scenes between them and also the professor is quite funny. I must point out the final scene - I liked it very much and ended the film on a high note. I would take films like this, made with love and passion despite no budget over expensive, dull, pointless remakes any day of the week.

I picked up Night Fangs out of the Poundshop - it was worth every penny.Two lesbian art teachers are obsessed with the legend of Elizabeth Bathory and get it into their heads to bathe in some blood in order to become immortal. After their first experiment fails, they obtain Bathory's diary and realise that they need the blood of a virgin to complete the ritual. Good job they've got a class of youngsters to choose from, eh?Night Fangs is a cheap and cheerful shot-on-digital vampire film that starts off slowly but then heads off into Salem's Lot territory. It has faults, and a lot of continuity errors, but I forgive that because the people involved here have managed to create a pretty good film with plenty of gore and nudity to keep you going. Some of the acting is a bit clunky (amongst the younger actors) but I'd say job well done to director Islas, with further point added for having the lead actress having real bodies as opposed to the silicone enhanced barbie dolls we're used to seeing.I don't even like vampire films that much, but I liked this one.

I think the guy who wrote the comment that is posted wouldn't know a good horror flick if it bit him on the behind. I loved Night Fangs. And wouldn't you know,it is a low budget film. I thought the actors,setting, and storyline were all very good! If the first ten minutes were a waist of time why would you continue to watch it? I thought the director,Ricardo Islas, did a fantastic job with this movie. Adding Elizabeth Bathory into this film also added a touch of history. Judging by the cover of this movie you can already tell that it isn't something off of the history channel. This is a movie about Vampires! So if you are looking for a movie that is lame, with no gore, or if your looking for something that is a waist of time, then your looking in the wrong place. Night Fangs has everything your looking for in a Vampire movie.

... though it would be better if you could reverse the flow of time by 98 minutes, and THEN pullout my eyeballs, before I sat down to watch 'Night Fangs'. Sometimes, a director with vision and an artistic eye can create a really good, creepy little horror film, using a low budget and a lot of imagination. This isn't one of those times. 'Night Fangs' was truly one of the worst films I've ever seen -- as a vampire film, it failed on every possible level. Crap storyline, crap acting, crap script, unerotic, and of course, not the slightest bit frightening. This wasn't even junior high-caliber stuff, folks: Spanky and the Gang could have pulled together a show scarier than this. Save a few brain cells and find something, ANYTHING, else to do other than watching this "film". I beg of you.