Wild Seven (2006)

ya see this is what happens when you are too influenced by a director's style which is just out of your league. OK we get it, you like Tarantino, nothing wrong with that, but when you quite clearly don't have the writing skill that he has and none of your friends who you cast in the movie bother to tell you your material is sub par, well that's when stinkers like this piece of junk get made into actual movies that waste people's time and money, and when you waste people's time and money then that's when you get people feeling compelled to write and warn everyone that your work is rubbish, well shot rubbish with reasonable sound etc but content wise, annoyingly bad.What made you rush your ability? Why'd you bite off way more than you could chew, and who green lite this stinker? truth is there is some craft in your movie, but none of it has to do with story or content, which is so overwhelmingly bad and so obviously derivative at a level well below those of the people you emulate that it kinda makes me angry.what a waste of time. stay well clear.

In the beginning everything seems to be a great movie. Somehow, exactly everything is plain boring and you get tired of this crap. I gave it 55 minutes then I pulled out the cable for my TV. Save time, do something else in stead of seeing this load of crap. There aren't any big actors in the movie, maybe Robert Loggia and Forrester, and even if the try very hard at the acting its a plain bad manuscript. One of the most annoying things also is the jumping in time back and forth for "flashbacks" or what the director had in mind. Its just like a bad, so bad, copy of Pulp Fiction or something =). When I saw this movie it had about 6.8 on IMDb. Looking now it has dropped to 5.8 so I guess people doesn't, as me, like this stupid crap.

....that's the impression I had of this movie.It was genuinely awful. For all its edgy posing, the hackneyed dialogue, the poor acting from the twenty-somethings, the plot line that somehow managed to be overly convoluted and boringly simplistic at the same time, and the flat one-dimensional characters made this movie seem like torture by blandness.When I wasn't injecting my own MST3K commentary, I was wondering how anyone could possibly have funded this movie - and I imagined that the fathers of the actors/director were all oil billionaires or something.It's part of the culture of entitlement with the twenty-something offspring of wealthy parents - if you want to make a movie, you can do it! If you want to record a rap album, you can do it! You're great! Here's the problem: Somewhere along the way people seem to have forgotten that creating great art requires talent and imagination. Hell, creating mediocre art requires some talent and imagination. Creating a movie like Wild 7 only requires Daddy Warbucks and an unearned sense of self-confidence fostered by overly-indulgent parents and a true lack of understanding about what makes great movies great.In short ... we all love movies. But, that doesn't me we all can make them. Sometimes you're only cut out to be a fan.

saw this minutes ago and looked it up cause i had never heard of it. though i think a ten OR nine is way high for this picture, i must say i enjoyed it. it's way to short, to start and the narrative gets shaky from time to time, but it's a fun story....a quick little ride. a couple of the younger actors didn't do it for me, but they seem like they're probably new to the whole thing. what hooked me from the getgo was brains painting the ceiling..gotta love when a character gets his head blown off in the first six minutes...either way, i felt like the story didn't want me to know he was his father, but the story also didn't tell me i wasn't supposed to know that, so...that was weak. but overall, i enjoyed it and thought it was worth the watch.