UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

Shark Zone

Shark Zone (2003)

October. 14,2003
|
2.8
| Adventure Horror Action Thriller

A secret fortune in diamonds lies at the bottom of the ocean but the treasure is also home to a school of deadly Great White sharks. Only one man knows the truth when a group of divers is attacked while searching for the loot. Now, the sharks are hunting swimmers on a nearby beach. The slaughter will continue until someone believes him.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

SanteeFats
2003/10/14

I gave it a 1 because I couldn't give it a 0. The Syfy channel seems to lean a lot more to fantasy with their "original" movies than the realm of science fiction.Great Whites are solitary hunters.There is no natural way they would hunt in packs. Yes several might show up for investigative purposes or to feed on something big like a whale carcass but never as a school. The growling, especially underwater, is more fantasy. Great Whites do not growl. Even though the gestation period is unknown, the growth rate of Great Whites are extremely slow. They eat mostly fish until about 10-12 feet in length. So even though the main sharker mentions it a couple of times it has no bearing on the attacks. I may seem like I am too exacting about these matters but they are so well known where I live that I think it could have been written closer to real life since they were using known locations and sharks.

More
redhead9898
2003/10/15

Okay, the beginning is stupid because great whites don't hunt in packs, and the woman with blonde hair is never shown being eaten but the story says she was... when he has a dream with his wife getting eaten, it's like slow mochine, and at the beach the sharks roar above and below the surface, and sharks din;t roar. The director must be completely idiotic, and i mean in the beginning while they swim they talk to each other but their no device with them allowing them to communicate with each other. I mean come on, i would have sat through shark attack which is one of the most boringest shark attack films I ever saw. So don't waste your time on this garbage. The director and crew wasted their time working on this junk. I give the rating a : F- because the movie is one of the worst cheesiest b-movies I ever saw. So don't waste your time watching this.

More
French-Friday
2003/10/16

This time, there's more than stock shots sharks and the attacks are more thrilling than previously on the Shark Attack trilogy, that's already a plus ! It's always a rip off of Jaws but that's usual for that kind of B movies, I don't mind. To me who loves sharks to death, it's always a pleasure to watch a shark movie, even if none reached the Jaws quadrilogy level. A lot of blood in that movie, and a lot of deaths, that's always fun to watch. I think the score is really bad and hurt the movie a lot. The opening titles music wasn't an horror one at all and beginning a movie without any kind of "terror" in the music is idiot. Anyway, it was a fun watch, not boring at all. Could have been way better, the subplot with the Russian guy was interesting but not enough developed. It was just a way to make the movie longer. Don't buy it, but watch it and record it when it's on TV !

More
Eileen McHenry
2003/10/17

A rare treasure for the seeker after endearingly bad movies. Full of logical gaps, thudding dialogue, no-goodnik Russians and, of course, KILLER SHARKS! Features a plot stitched together from leftover scraps of 'Jaws' and 'Austen Powers' and shark-attack scenes edited with a woodchipper. You will watch and enjoy this one over and over, but probably not for the reasons the filmmakers hoped.

More